<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Personal Brand Building &#8211; Make Yourself Notorious</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/search-marketing/personal-brand-building-make-yourself-notorious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/search-marketing/personal-brand-building-make-yourself-notorious/</link>
	<description>Bloom Media are an award winning 'full service digital agency', we provide ROI focussed digital campaigns for some of the UK's biggest brands.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:11:19 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: stuartpturner</title>
		<link>http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/search-marketing/personal-brand-building-make-yourself-notorious/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>stuartpturner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/?p=297#comment-260</guid>
		<description>Good point Steph! 

The issue of whether you should or should not promote your company/agency and who &#039;owns&#039; your content/connections is becoming a big one, there are a couple of interesting posts on this subject:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/archives/2009/04/who_owns_what_o.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bruce Clay - Who Owns What on the Web?&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2009/04/03/do-you-have-a-social-media-non-compete/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Duct Tape Marketing on Social Media Non-Complete&lt;/a&gt;

Ultimately (one would hope) your company will come to realise the value of any work you&#039;ve done off your own bat and recognise that networking online is just as valuable as offline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Steph! </p>
<p>The issue of whether you should or should not promote your company/agency and who &#8216;owns&#8217; your content/connections is becoming a big one, there are a couple of interesting posts on this subject:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/archives/2009/04/who_owns_what_o.html" rel="nofollow">Bruce Clay &#8211; Who Owns What on the Web?</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/2009/04/03/do-you-have-a-social-media-non-compete/" rel="nofollow">Duct Tape Marketing on Social Media Non-Complete</a></p>
<p>Ultimately (one would hope) your company will come to realise the value of any work you&#8217;ve done off your own bat and recognise that networking online is just as valuable as offline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steph Woods</title>
		<link>http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/search-marketing/personal-brand-building-make-yourself-notorious/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>Steph Woods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/?p=297#comment-259</guid>
		<description>At the end of the day, getting new business is the end goal. If you are writing or talking about work and the theories behind it, it is challenging to not reference whom you are working for. If you are writing about SEO, design or dev you will need to reference working examples (aka your place of employment), which will hopefully result in new sales for your services via your place of employment.

When I used to work for a company, I worked on my personal brand but would still reference Acro Media and use their link on my social media profiles. Having their link on my profiles drove traffic to their site. 

The thing is, now that I have my own work-in-progress site, I would probably use that as my link instead of Acro&#039;s if I still worked for them. They paid me as an internet marketer, but they didn&#039;t provide me with hourly tasks to promote them via social media (although I suggested it time and again).  

Ultimately it is something that should be discussed at the beginning of the working relationship. If a employer would like to pay an employee to promote themselves via their company and social media then they should do so.  If an employee offers their services this way and they are turned down, than there should be nothing stopping the employee from continuing their self promotion (on their own time of course).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the end of the day, getting new business is the end goal. If you are writing or talking about work and the theories behind it, it is challenging to not reference whom you are working for. If you are writing about SEO, design or dev you will need to reference working examples (aka your place of employment), which will hopefully result in new sales for your services via your place of employment.</p>
<p>When I used to work for a company, I worked on my personal brand but would still reference Acro Media and use their link on my social media profiles. Having their link on my profiles drove traffic to their site. </p>
<p>The thing is, now that I have my own work-in-progress site, I would probably use that as my link instead of Acro&#8217;s if I still worked for them. They paid me as an internet marketer, but they didn&#8217;t provide me with hourly tasks to promote them via social media (although I suggested it time and again).  </p>
<p>Ultimately it is something that should be discussed at the beginning of the working relationship. If a employer would like to pay an employee to promote themselves via their company and social media then they should do so.  If an employee offers their services this way and they are turned down, than there should be nothing stopping the employee from continuing their self promotion (on their own time of course).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stuartpturner</title>
		<link>http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/search-marketing/personal-brand-building-make-yourself-notorious/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>stuartpturner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/?p=297#comment-258</guid>
		<description>I thought you&#039;d like that ;)

It&#039;s true that common goals are key - if you end up with people constantly trying to further purely their own ends then you don&#039;t have a team to begin with. When everyone is united by their love of SEO (or design, or development) however, it can only be a good thing to have a mix of both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought you&#8217;d like that <img src='http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It&#8217;s true that common goals are key &#8211; if you end up with people constantly trying to further purely their own ends then you don&#8217;t have a team to begin with. When everyone is united by their love of SEO (or design, or development) however, it can only be a good thing to have a mix of both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Craven</title>
		<link>http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/search-marketing/personal-brand-building-make-yourself-notorious/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Craven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/?p=297#comment-257</guid>
		<description>As you know Stu we have discussed this, I am all for well known staff but prefer it if they build their &#039;notoriety&#039; (definately the most appropriate term in your case ;-) from within the agency. i.e. blogging on the Bloom site, attending networking events as a member of Bloom first, notorious individual second.

What we sell are our people and in the same way a business wants to promote its product, our people are our product and so naturally we should promote them and allow them to self promote. However, an agency is greater than the sum of its parts and individual staff members need to make sure they remember they are part of a team and promoting the common cuase comes first. To forget this is to risk being seen as arrogant and self serving, and resentment builds from other less extrovert team members which ultimately risks undermining the team spirit that is so important in an agency.

it isnt just bosses that want to make sure self promotion benefits the agency first and foremost, it is just as important to peers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you know Stu we have discussed this, I am all for well known staff but prefer it if they build their &#8216;notoriety&#8217; (definately the most appropriate term in your case <img src='http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  from within the agency. i.e. blogging on the Bloom site, attending networking events as a member of Bloom first, notorious individual second.</p>
<p>What we sell are our people and in the same way a business wants to promote its product, our people are our product and so naturally we should promote them and allow them to self promote. However, an agency is greater than the sum of its parts and individual staff members need to make sure they remember they are part of a team and promoting the common cuase comes first. To forget this is to risk being seen as arrogant and self serving, and resentment builds from other less extrovert team members which ultimately risks undermining the team spirit that is so important in an agency.</p>
<p>it isnt just bosses that want to make sure self promotion benefits the agency first and foremost, it is just as important to peers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
