<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Bloom Media Blog&#187; Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/tag/apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>Bloom Media are an award winning 'full service digital agency', we provide ROI focussed digital campaigns for some of the UK's biggest brands.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 08:31:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>AppStore Search Engine</title>
		<link>http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/stuff-and-nonsense/appstore-search-engine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/stuff-and-nonsense/appstore-search-engine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Kelly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff & Nonsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appstore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/?p=606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I just stumbled across what looks like a very useful way of browsing/searching Apple&#8217;s AppStore from your desktop.
Enjoy!



Share and Enjoy:


	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/uquery.jpg" alt="uquery" title="uquery" width="518" height="178" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-607" /></p>
<p>I just stumbled across what looks like a very useful way of browsing/searching Apple&#8217;s AppStore from your desktop.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uquery.com/">Enjoy!</a></p>



Share and Enjoy:


	<a rel="nofollow" href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloommedia.co.uk%2Fblog%2Fstuff-and-nonsense%2Fappstore-search-engine%2F&amp;title=AppStore%20Search%20Engine" title="Digg"><img src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/digg.png" title="Digg" alt="Digg" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" href="http://sphinn.com/submit.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloommedia.co.uk%2Fblog%2Fstuff-and-nonsense%2Fappstore-search-engine%2F&amp;title=AppStore%20Search%20Engine" title="Sphinn"><img src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/sphinn.png" title="Sphinn" alt="Sphinn" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" href="http://del.icio.us/post?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloommedia.co.uk%2Fblog%2Fstuff-and-nonsense%2Fappstore-search-engine%2F&amp;title=AppStore%20Search%20Engine" title="del.icio.us"><img src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/delicious.png" title="del.icio.us" alt="del.icio.us" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloommedia.co.uk%2Fblog%2Fstuff-and-nonsense%2Fappstore-search-engine%2F&amp;t=AppStore%20Search%20Engine" title="Facebook"><img src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/facebook.png" title="Facebook" alt="Facebook" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.mixx.com/submit?page_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloommedia.co.uk%2Fblog%2Fstuff-and-nonsense%2Fappstore-search-engine%2F&amp;title=AppStore%20Search%20Engine" title="Mixx"><img src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/mixx.png" title="Mixx" alt="Mixx" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.google.com/bookmarks/mark?op=edit&amp;bkmk=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloommedia.co.uk%2Fblog%2Fstuff-and-nonsense%2Fappstore-search-engine%2F&amp;title=AppStore%20Search%20Engine" title="Google"><img src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/googlebookmark.png" title="Google" alt="Google" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" href="http://technorati.com/faves?add=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloommedia.co.uk%2Fblog%2Fstuff-and-nonsense%2Fappstore-search-engine%2F" title="Technorati"><img src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/technorati.png" title="Technorati" alt="Technorati" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" href="http://reddit.com/submit?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloommedia.co.uk%2Fblog%2Fstuff-and-nonsense%2Fappstore-search-engine%2F&amp;title=AppStore%20Search%20Engine" title="Reddit"><img src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/reddit.png" title="Reddit" alt="Reddit" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloommedia.co.uk%2Fblog%2Fstuff-and-nonsense%2Fappstore-search-engine%2F&amp;title=AppStore%20Search%20Engine" title="StumbleUpon"><img src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/stumbleupon.png" title="StumbleUpon" alt="StumbleUpon" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>


<br/><br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/stuff-and-nonsense/appstore-search-engine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web Browser Statistics</title>
		<link>http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/technical/web-browser-statistics-firefox-ie-chrome/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/technical/web-browser-statistics-firefox-ie-chrome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/?p=587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest browser stats from W3Counter make for interesting reading...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-597" src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/statistics2.jpg" alt="Browser-Statistics" width="518" height="178" />Here are the current web browsing stats from sites using the W3Counter. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.w3counter.com/globalstats.php">http://www.w3counter.com/globalstats.php</a></p>
<p><strong>The highlights :</strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">Operating Systems</span></strong></p>
<ul>
<li>At 60.55%, <strong>Windows XP</strong> is still three nearly 3 times more popular than Vista</li>
<li><strong>OSX</strong> sits at 7.11%</li>
<li><strong>Windows 7</strong> is about to overtake <strong>Linux</strong>, and it’s not even out to retail yet</li>
<li><strong>iPhone OSX</strong> sits between the deceased <strong>Windows 98</strong> and server based <strong>Windows Server 2003.</strong>  <em>(I find it interesting that Server 2003 racks up a higher percentage than iPhone as by default it blocks trackers and cookies, also being a server OS, it typically isn&#8217;t used for web surfing)</em></li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">Browsers</span></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>IE 7</strong> dominates, with <strong>Firefox 3</strong> lagging 6% behind</li>
<li><strong>IE 8</strong> is close on the heels of <strong>Firefox 3</strong></li>
<li>The aging <strong>IE 6</strong> is still hanging in there with 14% of the share</li>
<li>Buggy <strong>Firefox 3.5</strong> is down in 5th place</li>
<li>Slow on the uptake, <strong>Chrome </strong>is way down in 7th place with a measly 3.23% of the share</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Screen Resolutions</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>1024&#215;768</strong> is still top dog</li>
<li>VERY closely followed by <strong>1280&#215;800</strong>, which is a wide screen resolution, typically not found on new monitors having been superseded by :</li>
<li><strong>1440&#215;900</strong> (as used by our office Dell desktops) which is in 4th with 8.68%, that’s a bigger share than the total OSX users – this will eventually overtake <strong>1280&#215;800</strong> as the standard wide desktop resolution.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Summary<br />
</strong>IE6 has double the market share of OSX as a whole.  So let’s stop banging on about ditching IE6 and get rid of OSX instead.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.saveie6.com"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.saveie6.com/_img/badge_saveie6.gif" alt="" width="113" height="118" /></a></p>
<p><a title="SaveIE6: Help save the best browser around!" href="http://www.saveie6.com"></a></p>



Share and Enjoy:


	<a rel="nofollow" href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloommedia.co.uk%2Fblog%2Ftechnical%2Fweb-browser-statistics-firefox-ie-chrome%2F&amp;title=Web%20Browser%20Statistics%20" title="Digg"><img src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/digg.png" title="Digg" alt="Digg" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" href="http://sphinn.com/submit.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloommedia.co.uk%2Fblog%2Ftechnical%2Fweb-browser-statistics-firefox-ie-chrome%2F&amp;title=Web%20Browser%20Statistics%20" title="Sphinn"><img src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/sphinn.png" title="Sphinn" alt="Sphinn" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" href="http://del.icio.us/post?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloommedia.co.uk%2Fblog%2Ftechnical%2Fweb-browser-statistics-firefox-ie-chrome%2F&amp;title=Web%20Browser%20Statistics%20" title="del.icio.us"><img src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/delicious.png" title="del.icio.us" alt="del.icio.us" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloommedia.co.uk%2Fblog%2Ftechnical%2Fweb-browser-statistics-firefox-ie-chrome%2F&amp;t=Web%20Browser%20Statistics%20" title="Facebook"><img src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/facebook.png" title="Facebook" alt="Facebook" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.mixx.com/submit?page_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloommedia.co.uk%2Fblog%2Ftechnical%2Fweb-browser-statistics-firefox-ie-chrome%2F&amp;title=Web%20Browser%20Statistics%20" title="Mixx"><img src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/mixx.png" title="Mixx" alt="Mixx" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.google.com/bookmarks/mark?op=edit&amp;bkmk=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloommedia.co.uk%2Fblog%2Ftechnical%2Fweb-browser-statistics-firefox-ie-chrome%2F&amp;title=Web%20Browser%20Statistics%20" title="Google"><img src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/googlebookmark.png" title="Google" alt="Google" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" href="http://technorati.com/faves?add=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloommedia.co.uk%2Fblog%2Ftechnical%2Fweb-browser-statistics-firefox-ie-chrome%2F" title="Technorati"><img src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/technorati.png" title="Technorati" alt="Technorati" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" href="http://reddit.com/submit?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloommedia.co.uk%2Fblog%2Ftechnical%2Fweb-browser-statistics-firefox-ie-chrome%2F&amp;title=Web%20Browser%20Statistics%20" title="Reddit"><img src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/reddit.png" title="Reddit" alt="Reddit" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloommedia.co.uk%2Fblog%2Ftechnical%2Fweb-browser-statistics-firefox-ie-chrome%2F&amp;title=Web%20Browser%20Statistics%20" title="StumbleUpon"><img src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/stumbleupon.png" title="StumbleUpon" alt="StumbleUpon" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>


<br/><br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/technical/web-browser-statistics-firefox-ie-chrome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple vs Palm &#8211; A Needless Fight?</title>
		<link>http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/technology-talk/apple-vs-palm-a-needless-fight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/technology-talk/apple-vs-palm-a-needless-fight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stuartpturner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology Talk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palm pre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/?p=571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will the Palm Pre be the long awaited iPhone killer we keep hearing about, or just another flash in the pan?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-575" title="Geek Considers Iphone vs Pre" src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Geek-Considers-Iphone-vs-Pre.jpg" alt="Geek Considers Iphone vs Pre" width="518" height="178" /></p>
<p>You may have seen the recent furore (actually <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/">began in January</a>) online regarding the Palm Pre and iTunes. For those that haven&#8217;t, the gist of the problem is this;</p>
<p>Palm are releasing a sexy looking new phone, the Pre, which not only looks like the only realistic contender to the iPhone but has a completely bespoke <a href="http://www.webos-internals.org/wiki/Main_Page">webOS</a> (based on Linux). There&#8217;s a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/palm-pre-review/">comprehensive review</a> on Engadget with some videos.</p>
<p>Palm would like to be able to sync this phone with iTunes, so they made it appear like an iPhone/iPod when connected to do so. Apple took incredible umbradge at this and have released several updates to stop it working. As there are several zealous Macolytes in our agency a debate has been raging via email which I present to you here. The two opposing sides can be summarised as:</p>
<p><span style="color: #00ccff;"><strong>Side (a)</strong>: Consumers should have freedom of choice and Apple should let them use iTunes with the Pre, the decision not to damages their reputation</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff6600;"><strong>Side (b)</strong>: Apple are protecting their business interests and don&#8217;t think this decision will damage their reputation</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff6600;"><br />
</span></p>
<div id="attachment_576" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 435px"><img class="size-full wp-image-576" title="Old Black Telephone" src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/iStock_000002523894XSmall.jpg" alt="Can't we just use these?" width="425" height="282" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Can&#39;t we just use these?</p></div>
<p><span style="color: #00ccff;"><strong>(a) Says:</strong><br />
&#8220;“Palm is currently locked in a long-running battle with Apple over the Pre&#8217;s ability to synchronise with a user&#8217;s iTunes library. When the Pre first launched, it could copy across songs from a user&#8217;s iTunes library by tricking the software in to thinking that it was communicating with an iPod. But Apple quickly issued an iTunes software update that disabled this capability, only for Palm to issue its own software update for the Pre to reinstate iTunes synchronisation.&#8221;</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #00ccff;">Last week&#8217;s launch of iTunes 9 has again disabled the Pre&#8217;s iTunes syncing feature, and users are waiting anxiously to see what Palm&#8217;s next move will be. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #00ccff;">“As we’ve said before, newer versions of Apple’s iTunes software may no longer provide syncing functionality with unsupported digital media players,” warned Apple in a statement.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #00ccff;">&#8220;Apple’s decision to disable Palm media sync again is yet another direct blow to its own iTunes customers who will be deprived of a seamless and familiar synchronisation experience,&#8221; retaliated Palm in a statement.”<br />
Why? Because Apple want you to roll over and receive your iPhone/iPod as a suppository every 12 months.&#8221;</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff6600;"><strong>(b) Says:</strong><br />
When the Pre first launched, it could copy across songs from a user&#8217;s iTunes library by tricking the software in to thinking that it was communicating with an iPod. But Apple quickly issued an iTunes software update that disabled this capability</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff6600;">LOL! Why does Palm have to keep trying to hack iTunes to get it to work? Maybe its because there is no other song purchase program out there that is as good?! Of course with Spotify released as an app that could change! Laughable how Palm have to look for ways to hack iTunes! <img src='http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #00ccff;"><strong>(a) Says:</strong><br />
I know this is one for the blog (SPT &#8211; Yes it is!) – but please take your Apple tinted glasses off for a moment! Apple has just denied another reasonable source of income by locking out the Pre.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #00ccff;">Maybe they (Apple) should look at the opportunities to open up iTMS to other devices and therefore increase their opportunities of even further revenue generation!</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #00ccff;">Besides which, you could use Double Twist (http://www.doubletwist.com/dt/Home/Index.dt) and sync anyway!</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff6600;"><strong>(b) Says:</strong><br />
Perhaps Apple are trying to protect itself from other vendor’s carbon copying them…</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff6600;">4)	Poach a senior iPhone architect &#8211; check<br />
5)	Infringe Apple’s Multitouch and Gestures Patents – check<br />
6)	Hack iTunes ‘integration’ by violating USB regulations and get ass slapped – check</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff6600;">And yet Apple is in the wrong for protecting their own platform? I don’t think Apple needs the dribbles of revenue that the Pre will generate.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #00ccff;"><strong>(a) Says:</strong><br />
I don’t see how they’re protecting their platform, people who want an iPhone will still get one and allowing their main competitor in the phone sector access to their own music sales channel is surely the best way to capture lost revenue from people who buy a Pre instead?</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #00ccff;">In regards to these points:</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #00ccff;">1)	Poach a senior iPhone architect – check – unlucky, he obviously felt he could do better elsewhere<br />
2)	Infringe Apple’s Multitouch and Gestures Patents – check – the ascension of touchscreens means there will be a lot more of this in future<br />
3)	Hack iTunes ‘integration’ by violating USB regulations and get ass slapped – check – again they haven’t hacked iTunes, they make their phone appear like an iPhone as this is the only way to use it with iTunes if you’re not going to be forced into getting a contract from O2 for an iPhone</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #00ccff;">What’s the beef with getting more people access to iTunes? Maybe you want the software but not an iPhone (this is going to be an issue outside of just the Pre) but all Apple are saying is ‘No, buy an iPhone’. It’s just not (to my mind) a sensible way to get the most out of iTunes…</span></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #00ccff;">(a)</span> and <span style="color: #ff9900;">(b)</span> Say:</strong><br />
Woah there!</p>
<p><span style="color: #00ccff;">(a)<br />
There are other options to sync, it just strikes me as very odd that Apple have gone down this road that’s al. Fair enough if they don’t make any money from iTunes but they would still maintain a larger presence (from a branding point of view) but letting more people use iTunes. And if they only break even surely that’s an even bigger reason to grow the iTunes user base, rather than limit it?</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff6600;">(b)<br />
I don’t see it as odd in any way. They make much more profit selling iPhones and iPod’s, not content on iTunes. In order to use iTunes, the music biggest retailer in the US, and largest online retailer in the world, you need an iPhone or an iPod. Allowing other vendors to use iTunes would likely mean less hardware sold, but (I agree) increased iTunes revenue. However, the difference between the two would result in negative profit growth.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #00ccff;">(a)<br />
I’m hearing a lot of Apple do no wrong talk is all I’m saying. You can’t groundlessly assume that the Pre is an inferior platform prior to a UK release or UK road test – if Apple are that worried that it will rob iPhone marketshare maybe they should just roll out another cash in update? Make it a little bit faster again maybe?</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff6600;">(b)<br />
All I hear is that Apple always do wrong, and have inferior products and software. IMO the Pre is inferior; it doesn’t support native apps, there is no music subscription service, it has poor battery life, apparently feels cheap and the lack of software keyboard is a major disadvantage. (ed. the Pre actually does feature a <a href="http://www.webos-internals.org/wiki/On_Screen_Keyboard">software keyboard</a>, other facts are uncited as yet)</span></p>
<div id="attachment_577" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 435px"><img class="size-full wp-image-577" title="Hammer &amp; Gavel" src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/iStock_000000784376XSmall.jpg" alt="The Judgement!" width="425" height="282" /><p class="wp-caption-text">The Judgement!</p></div>
<p><strong>Conclusion?</strong><br />
Well as you can see we have not reached any kind of conclusion here, the Macboys love Apple, the others love other stuff.</p>
<p>For my part I think the Pre will be an excellent alternative to the iPhone, the review (above) is positive and considering the iPhone has a 3 year headstart in terms of App developement and software fixes it would be foolish to rule the Pre out yet.</p>
<p>But at the end of the day, Apple, Palm, can&#8217;t we all just learn to get along?</p>



Share and Enjoy:


	<a rel="nofollow" href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloommedia.co.uk%2Fblog%2Ftechnology-talk%2Fapple-vs-palm-a-needless-fight%2F&amp;title=Apple%20vs%20Palm%20-%20A%20Needless%20Fight%3F" title="Digg"><img src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/digg.png" title="Digg" alt="Digg" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" href="http://sphinn.com/submit.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloommedia.co.uk%2Fblog%2Ftechnology-talk%2Fapple-vs-palm-a-needless-fight%2F&amp;title=Apple%20vs%20Palm%20-%20A%20Needless%20Fight%3F" title="Sphinn"><img src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/sphinn.png" title="Sphinn" alt="Sphinn" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" href="http://del.icio.us/post?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloommedia.co.uk%2Fblog%2Ftechnology-talk%2Fapple-vs-palm-a-needless-fight%2F&amp;title=Apple%20vs%20Palm%20-%20A%20Needless%20Fight%3F" title="del.icio.us"><img src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/delicious.png" title="del.icio.us" alt="del.icio.us" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloommedia.co.uk%2Fblog%2Ftechnology-talk%2Fapple-vs-palm-a-needless-fight%2F&amp;t=Apple%20vs%20Palm%20-%20A%20Needless%20Fight%3F" title="Facebook"><img src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/facebook.png" title="Facebook" alt="Facebook" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.mixx.com/submit?page_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloommedia.co.uk%2Fblog%2Ftechnology-talk%2Fapple-vs-palm-a-needless-fight%2F&amp;title=Apple%20vs%20Palm%20-%20A%20Needless%20Fight%3F" title="Mixx"><img src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/mixx.png" title="Mixx" alt="Mixx" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.google.com/bookmarks/mark?op=edit&amp;bkmk=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloommedia.co.uk%2Fblog%2Ftechnology-talk%2Fapple-vs-palm-a-needless-fight%2F&amp;title=Apple%20vs%20Palm%20-%20A%20Needless%20Fight%3F" title="Google"><img src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/googlebookmark.png" title="Google" alt="Google" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" href="http://technorati.com/faves?add=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloommedia.co.uk%2Fblog%2Ftechnology-talk%2Fapple-vs-palm-a-needless-fight%2F" title="Technorati"><img src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/technorati.png" title="Technorati" alt="Technorati" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" href="http://reddit.com/submit?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloommedia.co.uk%2Fblog%2Ftechnology-talk%2Fapple-vs-palm-a-needless-fight%2F&amp;title=Apple%20vs%20Palm%20-%20A%20Needless%20Fight%3F" title="Reddit"><img src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/reddit.png" title="Reddit" alt="Reddit" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloommedia.co.uk%2Fblog%2Ftechnology-talk%2Fapple-vs-palm-a-needless-fight%2F&amp;title=Apple%20vs%20Palm%20-%20A%20Needless%20Fight%3F" title="StumbleUpon"><img src="http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/stumbleupon.png" title="StumbleUpon" alt="StumbleUpon" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>


<br/><br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bloommedia.co.uk/blog/technology-talk/apple-vs-palm-a-needless-fight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
